1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:05,280
If you’re a human person, one of those things&nbsp;
you’re gonna wanna do with some regularity

2
00:00:05,280 --> 00:00:07,119
is boil water.

3
00:00:07,119 --> 00:00:11,376
We do it for lots of reasons,&nbsp;
from cooking to cleaning and disinfecting

4
00:00:11,376 --> 00:00:13,441
to... other things probably.

5
00:00:13,441 --> 00:00:18,962
And one of&nbsp;those other things is preparing hot beverages such as tea.

6
00:00:18,962 --> 00:00:21,338
Maybe you’d file that&nbsp;under cooking, I dunno, it doesn’t matter,

7
00:00:21,338 --> 00:00:26,185
anyway this is such a common practice in&nbsp;
the daily lives of humans across the planet

8
00:00:26,185 --> 00:00:31,510
that purpose-built water-boily-poury things,&nbsp;
called kettles, are quite a common sight.

9
00:00:32,080 --> 00:00:36,720
But they’re a little less common here in the US&nbsp;
than they are in many other parts of the world,&nbsp;&nbsp;

10
00:00:36,720 --> 00:00:39,320
particularly the electric variety.

11
00:00:39,320 --> 00:00:43,696
Actually, I&nbsp;think it’s fair to say they’re a lot less common.

12
00:00:43,696 --> 00:00:49,938
One often cited reason is that our 120V&nbsp;
electrical supply just doesn’t have the gusto

13
00:00:49,938 --> 00:00:51,901
to make electric kettles worth it.

14
00:00:51,901 --> 00:00:54,239
Look, here it’s cited three times!

15
00:00:54,239 --> 00:00:59,780
But by the end of this video, I hope you’ll learn,&nbsp;
as I have, that this just…

16
00:00:59,780 --> 00:01:01,482
isn’t true.

17
00:01:01,482 --> 00:01:06,053
Electric kettles are, even though they are a lot slower&nbsp;
on this side of the Atlantic,

18
00:01:06,053 --> 00:01:10,047
still significantly faster than their stovetop counterparts.

19
00:01:10,047 --> 00:01:13,949
At&nbsp; least, for now - spoiler alert, there’s a twist.

20
00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:16,759
I’ll begin with some testing and demonstration.

21
00:01:16,759 --> 00:01:22,171
As a note, the times I’ll be referencing in this video came from off-camera tests.

22
00:01:22,171 --> 00:01:27,236
I’ll replicate&nbsp;some of the tests on-camera but the results will probably be slightly different.

23
00:01:27,236 --> 00:01:30,396
This is my&nbsp;stovetop kettle.

24
00:01:30,396 --> 00:01:31,930
It’s red!

25
00:01:31,930 --> 00:01:37,920
And it has a wide, flat bottom which is helpful for doing tests&nbsp;
because it’ll work great with any stove.

26
00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:43,202
Throughout this video, I’ll be bringing this&nbsp;much water to a boil.

27
00:01:43,202 --> 00:01:45,050
Yes, this is a SodaStream bottle.

28
00:01:45,050 --> 00:01:46,089
It was convenient.

29
00:01:46,089 --> 00:01:49,805
Anyway, this is pretty close to one liter, but not exactly.

30
00:01:49,805 --> 00:01:53,285
The most important&nbsp;thing is I’m being consistent with each test.

31
00:01:53,285 --> 00:01:57,154
The water will come straight from the tap and will&nbsp;
go into a cold kettle,

32
00:01:57,154 --> 00:01:59,621
and we’ll time how long it takes to boil.

33
00:01:59,621 --> 00:02:04,093
For this kettle, I will consider it&nbsp;
done when I hear the first peep from its whistle.

34
00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:12,142
On this gas stove’s “normal” burner, it took a&nbsp;
glacial 7m:40s to come to&nbsp;a boil.

35
00:02:12,142 --> 00:02:16,400
This stove does have a higher-power burner&nbsp;
available, but we’ll get back to it in a bit.

36
00:02:17,040 --> 00:02:20,087
Not everybody has a gas stove, though.

37
00:02:20,087 --> 00:02:25,774
And if you&nbsp;don’t, you might wanna consider yourself lucky but that’s a topic for another day.

38
00:02:25,774 --> 00:02:30,446
I brought the&nbsp;kettle and my measury bottle along with me for a visit with my parents.

39
00:02:30,446 --> 00:02:34,105
You see, they have a glass-ceramic electric cooktop.

40
00:02:34,105 --> 00:02:41,826
I don’t know what the exact power output is of the burners but I do know that the&nbsp;entire thing is 8.8 kW all together,

41
00:02:41,826 --> 00:02:49,074
and with these burners being the “average” size of four 
I think 2 kW&nbsp;is probably pretty fair.

42
00:02:49,074 --> 00:02:54,384
This burner, from cold, brought the kettle to a boil in six minutes flat.

43
00:02:54,384 --> 00:02:56,583
Which actually surprised me.

44
00:02:56,583 --> 00:03:00,846
I figured it wouldn’t be as fast as my gas stove but it actually&nbsp;beat it by nearly two minutes.

45
00:03:01,102 --> 00:03:01,776
Go figure.

46
00:03:02,160 --> 00:03:05,391
Now let’s see how an electric kettle will do.

47
00:03:05,391 --> 00:03:08,320
This&nbsp;is the cheapest kettle you can buy at Walmart.

48
00:03:08,880 --> 00:03:14,016
And as you can see, it sports an exquisite design&nbsp;
and is built of the highest quality materials.&nbsp;&nbsp;

49
00:03:14,560 --> 00:03:19,213
Like virtually all electric kettles this sports&nbsp;
an automatic shutoff feature,

50
00:03:19,213 --> 00:03:24,827
however there’s a substantial delay between when it begins&nbsp;
to boil and when the shutoff is actually tripped.

51
00:03:24,827 --> 00:03:29,578
So, I’ll be considering this kettle “done” the moment&nbsp;
it’s at a roaring boil.

52
00:03:29,578 --> 00:03:33,412
How long does this fella take to boil that amount of water?

53
00:03:33,412 --> 00:03:36,383
Four minutes and thirty-three&nbsp;seconds.

54
00:03:36,383 --> 00:03:39,424
I suspect some viewers are aghast at that performance,

55
00:03:39,424 --> 00:03:45,263
but that’s more than three&nbsp;minutes faster than the stovetop kettle on a gas stove,

56
00:03:45,263 --> 00:03:50,096
and about a minute-and-a-half faster than&nbsp;
the same kettle on a glass-ceramic electric stove.

57
00:03:50,560 --> 00:03:52,695
Why might that be?

58
00:03:52,695 --> 00:03:55,023
Well the answer is pretty&nbsp;simple.

59
00:03:55,023 --> 00:03:57,959
But before we get into it with excruciating detail,

60
00:03:57,959 --> 00:04:02,814
let me reiterate that the&nbsp;cheapest electric kettle I could get my hands on

61
00:04:02,814 --> 00:04:07,971
is significantly faster at boiling water than&nbsp;
this stovetop kettle,

62
00:04:07,971 --> 00:04:12,229
despite being limited by our 120V electrical system.

63
00:04:12,229 --> 00:04:18,561
Our weird system&nbsp;puts a practical limit of 1,500 watts
on most things which plug into ordinary outlets,

64
00:04:18,561 --> 00:04:21,583
although 1,800 watts is technically permissible

65
00:04:21,583 --> 00:04:25,582
and on a 20 amp circuit, which is fairly common&nbsp;
especially in kitchens,

66
00:04:25,582 --> 00:04:30,015
2,400 hundred watts is possible, but since it’s by no means universal

67
00:04:30,015 --> 00:04:32,922
(and requires a different plug to be compliant)

68
00:04:33,280 --> 00:04:40,867
most devices stick to a 12 amp limit, which nets&nbsp;
1,500 watts at a slightly optimistic 125 volts.

69
00:04:41,280 --> 00:04:44,365
That’s plenty of power for virtually anything,

70
00:04:44,365 --> 00:04:50,661
but many of you in 230 and 240 lands will find this kettle to be obnoxiously slow.

71
00:04:50,661 --> 00:04:55,701
I’ve also&nbsp;seen a few people here who have installed a 240V receptacle in their kitchen

72
00:04:55,701 --> 00:04:59,362
specifically&nbsp;to use with imported kettles,

73
00:04:59,362 --> 00:05:01,540
and I guess more power to ‘em.

74
00:05:03,332 --> 00:05:06,640
(just a reminder we&nbsp;actually have 240V power here, but we do it...

75
00:05:07,360 --> 00:05:09,997
weird, I made a video about it&nbsp;if you wanna learn more).

76
00:05:09,997 --> 00:05:11,933
Now, hot take;

77
00:05:11,933 --> 00:05:14,659
all y’all tea drinkers are frightfully&nbsp;impatient-
[said slipping into a Southern drawl]

78
00:05:14,659 --> 00:05:16,602
Oops, did I say that out loud?

79
00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:21,600
Anyway, with the knowledge that even a cheap&nbsp;
little kettle with our weak little plugs&nbsp;&nbsp;

80
00:05:21,600 --> 00:05:25,911
is still a lot faster at boiling water than a&nbsp;
kettle on a stove,

81
00:05:26,807 --> 00:05:30,976
why aren’t they the household staple that they are in other parts of the world?

82
00:05:30,976 --> 00:05:34,129
What a perplexing mystery, I doubt we’ll ever know the true ans -

83
00:05:34,129 --> 00:05:37,285
It’s because we don’t drink tea all that&nbsp;
much, you guys.

84
00:05:37,976 --> 00:05:39,032
That’s it.

85
00:05:39,032 --> 00:05:40,679
That’s the answer.

86
00:05:40,679 --> 00:05:46,348
It’s not like nobody here drinks tea, but I think it’s&nbsp;
fair to say that for the majority of households

87
00:05:46,348 --> 00:05:52,096
tea is more of a “Ooh I’m feeling fancy today,&nbsp;
let’s whip out the Earl Grey!” kind of a thing.

88
00:05:52,454 --> 00:05:56,359
It simply is not the cultural staple for us that&nbsp;
it might be for you,

89
00:05:56,359 --> 00:06:00,165
especially in the context of, say, social gatherings.

90
00:06:00,165 --> 00:06:05,304
When friends come&nbsp;‘round, putting a kettle on is not really in our cultural vernacular -

91
00:06:05,304 --> 00:06:08,568
but brewing a pot of coffee&nbsp;absolutely is.

92
00:06:08,568 --> 00:06:14,140
So, since most of us find ourselves boiling water for tea only occasionally (if ever),

93
00:06:14,140 --> 00:06:17,027
a faster, purpose-built water-boily-poury-thing

94
00:06:17,280 --> 00:06:20,457
is just not on the average American mind.

95
00:06:20,457 --> 00:06:22,392
That’s&nbsp;all there is to it.

96
00:06:22,392 --> 00:06:27,093
Yes, our electric kettles are slower than they are on the other side&nbsp;of the Atlantic, but!

97
00:06:27,093 --> 00:06:30,105
They’re still the fastest way to boil water!

98
00:06:30,105 --> 00:06:33,724
The trouble is that&nbsp;relatively few people even know to want them.

99
00:06:34,334 --> 00:06:39,680
So, why is this $15 lump of plastic&nbsp;so much
faster at this whole water boiling thing?

100
00:06:40,480 --> 00:06:43,249
Well, take a look inside of it.

101
00:06:43,249 --> 00:06:45,450
We can see the heating element.

102
00:06:46,000 --> 00:06:46,961
That’s it.

103
00:06:46,961 --> 00:06:48,403
That’s the thing what get hot.

104
00:06:48,403 --> 00:06:50,317
And&nbsp;when you fill it up with water,

105
00:06:50,317 --> 00:06:56,522
the heating element becomes submersed in and surrounded on&nbsp;all sides
by the stuff we’re aiming to heat.

106
00:06:57,040 --> 00:07:02,640
All of the energy that this thing can pull from the&nbsp;
wall is getting dumped straight into the water,

107
00:07:02,640 --> 00:07:05,889
save for whatever tiny bit is lost in the power&nbsp;cord.

108
00:07:05,889 --> 00:07:10,055
Many electric kettles don’t have an exposed heating element like you see here,

109
00:07:10,055 --> 00:07:15,002
but instead&nbsp;bond the element to the bottom surface of the kettle
which the water sits atop.

110
00:07:15,002 --> 00:07:17,536
It’s a different&nbsp;arrangement, but the effect is much the same.

111
00:07:18,080 --> 00:07:25,450
In comparison, a stovetop kettle can&nbsp;only try its best
at absorbing heat&nbsp;that’s getting blasted at it from below

112
00:07:25,450 --> 00:07:28,518
and then&nbsp;transfer that heat into the water it contains.

113
00:07:28,960 --> 00:07:33,744
That’s just much less effective than&nbsp;
releasing heat directly into the water.&nbsp;&nbsp;

114
00:07:34,240 --> 00:07:35,950
How much less effective is it?

115
00:07:35,950 --> 00:07:39,056
Well, we&nbsp;can find out pretty easily with some math!

116
00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:44,122
One fun thing about this universe&nbsp;is that 
Energy. Is. Energy.

117
00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:48,320
We have a lot of different names for it&nbsp;
and measure in a bunch of different ways,&nbsp;&nbsp;

118
00:07:48,320 --> 00:07:52,864
but it’s all the same thing and we can convert&nbsp;
between units easily.

119
00:07:52,864 --> 00:07:58,279
One of those units which is particularly useful for this discussion is&nbsp;the calorie.

120
00:07:58,279 --> 00:08:05,956
That’s how much energy it takes to elevate the temperature of 1 cubic centimeter&nbsp;(or one milliliter) of water by 1 degree Celsius.

121
00:08:07,211 --> 00:08:11,661
♫ lo-fi jazz plays ♫

122
00:08:20,800 --> 00:08:24,480
If we presume that the water from the&nbsp;
tap is at about 20 degrees Celsius,&nbsp;&nbsp;

123
00:08:24,480 --> 00:08:28,800
and we have 1,000 cubic centimeters&nbsp;
of water to raise up by 80 degrees,&nbsp;&nbsp;

124
00:08:29,360 --> 00:08:33,434
then it will take 80,000 calories&nbsp;
of energy to bring it to a boil.

125
00:08:34,000 --> 00:08:38,148
Now, we can ask a search engine to convert that&nbsp;
into a different unit for us!

126
00:08:38,148 --> 00:08:40,820
Let’s go with... joules.

127
00:08:40,820 --> 00:08:43,263
Agh, no, I didn’t want the kilocalorie.

128
00:08:43,263 --> 00:08:50,318
That’s what&nbsp;we commonly use for food, I just want 80,000 calories - the regular kind.

129
00:08:50,318 --> 00:08:56,639
Fine, 80 kilocalories&nbsp;is 334,720 joules.

130
00:08:56,639 --> 00:08:58,329
Why have I chosen joules?

131
00:08:58,329 --> 00:09:04,823
Well, here’s a fun thing; you know what the watt - the&nbsp;
commonly-used unit of electrical power - actually is?

132
00:09:04,823 --> 00:09:07,148
It’s one joule per second.

133
00:09:07,148 --> 00:09:10,720
And, since our&nbsp;electric kettles typically run at 1,500 watts,

134
00:09:11,216 --> 00:09:16,301
That means they can put 1,500 joules of energy into the&nbsp;
water every second.

135
00:09:16,301 --> 00:09:20,962
So if we divide 334,720
(the number of joules we need)

136
00:09:20,962 --> 00:09:25,651
by 1,500 
(the number&nbsp;of joules we can add to the water every second),

137
00:09:25,651 --> 00:09:32,266
we will find out how much time it should&nbsp;take for an electric kettle in the US to boil a liter of room temperature&nbsp;water in seconds.

138
00:09:32,266 --> 00:09:35,229
That answer? 223.

139
00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:39,440
In the real world, though, it took about 22%&nbsp;
longer than that.

140
00:09:39,440 --> 00:09:45,488
Our theoretical speed is 223 seconds, but the observed time was 273 seconds.

141
00:09:45,488 --> 00:09:48,111
What’s the cause of the discrepancy?

142
00:09:48,111 --> 00:09:49,785
Well actually there are two causes.

143
00:09:49,785 --> 00:09:53,360
First, this thing&nbsp;doesn’t actually pull 1500 watts from the wall.

144
00:09:54,080 --> 00:09:59,200
It’s a resistive electrical load - the heating&nbsp;
element is just a giant resistor, after all,&nbsp;&nbsp;

145
00:09:59,200 --> 00:10:04,431
so the actual power it consumes will depend on&nbsp;
the voltage at the receptacle.

146
00:10:04,431 --> 00:10:08,613
In my test it was drawing only 1,430 watts.

147
00:10:08,613 --> 00:10:14,888
Knowing that this was the&nbsp;real power output, our theoretical time should be revised to 234 seconds.

148
00:10:14,888 --> 00:10:19,014
Our observed time, though,&nbsp;
was still about 16% longer than that -

149
00:10:19,014 --> 00:10:20,549
why?

150
00:10:20,549 --> 00:10:22,383
Well, it’s not just the water that we’re heating.

151
00:10:22,383 --> 00:10:28,080
The&nbsp;body of the kettle itself gets warmed up through the water, and that thermal mass slows us down&nbsp;a bit.

152
00:10:28,080 --> 00:10:32,177
Plus, of course, some energy escapes into the room before the water boils -

153
00:10:32,177 --> 00:10:36,000
both through the&nbsp;sides getting warm and a bit escaping out the top.

154
00:10:36,480 --> 00:10:42,358
Still, though, only 16% more time&nbsp;
compared to literal perfection ain’t bad.

155
00:10:42,800 --> 00:10:44,495
Let’s switch things up a bit.

156
00:10:44,495 --> 00:10:47,143
Remember, 
Energy.&nbsp;Is. Energy.

157
00:10:47,143 --> 00:10:54,139
And we can convert the 80,000 calories it takes to lift a liter of water by 80 degrees&nbsp;celsius into watt-hours.

158
00:10:54,139 --> 00:11:02,914
Joules are fun and all, but since we tend to measure power output in&nbsp;watts it’s usually easier to conceptualize energy in watt-hours.

159
00:11:02,914 --> 00:11:05,669
Plus you get much smaller&nbsp;
numbers which is helpful.

160
00:11:05,669 --> 00:11:11,349
80,000 calories is about 93 watt-hours according to Google’s converty&nbsp;thing.

161
00:11:11,349 --> 00:11:13,840
How many watt-hours did our kettle use?

162
00:11:14,480 --> 00:11:19,191
Well, 273 seconds divided by the 3600 seconds&nbsp;
in an hour

163
00:11:19,191 --> 00:11:28,810
and then multiplied by the 1,430 watts the kettle was actually pulling tells&nbsp;us that we consumed 108.4 watt-hours which is…&nbsp;&nbsp;

164
00:11:29,280 --> 00:11:32,044
whaddya know, about 16% more&nbsp;than 93.

165
00:11:32,044 --> 00:11:33,498
Ain’t this fun?

166
00:11:33,920 --> 00:11:35,631
Let’s do a little more math!

167
00:11:35,631 --> 00:11:37,907
Through&nbsp;the Magic of Buying Two of Them,

168
00:11:37,907 --> 00:11:40,878
I have a second, slightly-fancier kettle!

169
00:11:40,878 --> 00:11:44,442
And this one sports RAPID-HEAT technology!

170
00:11:45,040 --> 00:11:48,213
Which is funny because it’s only rated 1,100&nbsp;watts.

171
00:11:48,213 --> 00:11:55,641
This one has the embedded heating element design - rather than a big curly thing getting&nbsp;hot, the bottom surface is what gets hot.

172
00:11:55,641 --> 00:12:01,534
Given what we’ve learned, we should be able to predict&nbsp;
how long this will take to boil a liter of water.&nbsp;&nbsp;

173
00:12:01,920 --> 00:12:10,286
Let’s see, 334,720 joules divided by 1,100 watts&nbsp;
is 304 seconds, or just over five minutes.

174
00:12:10,286 --> 00:12:14,339
I’ll go ahead and presume the same 22% overall discrepancy&nbsp;
from the cheap kettle

175
00:12:14,339 --> 00:12:20,000
(accounting for both a slightly lower-than-advertised power level and&nbsp;
also the energy needed to heat the kettle itself)

176
00:12:20,000 --> 00:12:26,421
and predict it should take about 371 seconds,&nbsp;
or six minutes and eleven seconds.

177
00:12:26,421 --> 00:12:29,189
Let’s see how long does it actually take?

178
00:12:29,189 --> 00:12:31,556
Oh good, blue&nbsp;LEDs.

179
00:12:31,556 --> 00:12:33,010
My favorite.

180
00:12:33,010 --> 00:12:37,375
And it actually took; six minutes and thirteen seconds,

181
00:12:37,375 --> 00:12:41,830
proving once&nbsp;again that energy is energy and water is water.

182
00:12:42,400 --> 00:12:46,532
So now, let’s take a look at the gas stove and&nbsp;stovetop kettle again.

183
00:12:46,532 --> 00:12:50,730
The burner which took 7 minutes and 40 seconds to bring this to a boil

184
00:12:50,730 --> 00:12:54,452
is&nbsp;rated 9,500 BTUs/hour.

185
00:12:54,452 --> 00:12:56,780
Oh good, another unit!

186
00:12:56,780 --> 00:13:01,251
Now, in this context, as is often done with the BTU for whatever reason,

187
00:13:01,251 --> 00:13:08,625
the manufacturer is using a unit of energy to convey power
 which is a bit confusing but it&nbsp;is what it is.

188
00:13:08,625 --> 00:13:14,663
I don’t have a way to verify its performance unfortunately, but if we assume the&nbsp;burner is performing to spec,

189
00:13:14,663 --> 00:13:24,000
the 9,500 BTUs/hour can be converted to instantaneous wattage and thus&nbsp;this burner outputs 2,785 watts at full-power.

190
00:13:24,720 --> 00:13:28,478
You may already see the absurdity here but let’s&nbsp;
keep going and work it out.

191
00:13:28,478 --> 00:13:33,288
It should take only 93 watt-hours to bring a liter of water to boil.

192
00:13:33,288 --> 00:13:38,974
This&nbsp;electric kettle, with a modest loss, took 108.4 watt-hours to do it.

193
00:13:38,974 --> 00:13:43,852
The second electric&nbsp;kettle with a lower power rating did take longer to do the job,

194
00:13:43,852 --> 00:13:47,723
but required a nearly identical amount&nbsp;of energy.

195
00:13:47,723 --> 00:13:57,334
This thing, sitting over 2,785 Watts of Fire 
manages to take more time to boil than&nbsp;either electric kettle;

196
00:13:57,334 --> 00:13:59,040
7 minutes and 40 seconds.

197
00:13:59,600 --> 00:14:04,633
That works out to 356 watt-hours of energy&nbsp;consumed.

198
00:14:04,633 --> 00:14:06,590
That’s astoundingly bad.

199
00:14:06,590 --> 00:14:09,333
Nearly quadruple what’s theoretically required,

200
00:14:09,333 --> 00:14:12,243
and&nbsp;more than triple what the electric kettles need.

201
00:14:12,400 --> 00:14:14,532
But it’s not really surprising, is it?

202
00:14:14,532 --> 00:14:18,994
I mean,&nbsp;this is just a cold object over an open flame.

203
00:14:18,994 --> 00:14:25,280
Of course the bulk of the energy being released as&nbsp;
the fuel combusts is just going around the kettle.

204
00:14:25,920 --> 00:14:32,686
If you’ve ever used a gas stove you’ve undoubtedly&nbsp;
felt how hot the air is above the… pot or&nbsp;whatever.

205
00:14:32,686 --> 00:14:37,360
That’s all the heat from the flame which&nbsp;
isn’t ending up in what you’re trying to heat.

206
00:14:38,240 --> 00:14:44,160
Sure, some of it’s making it in there, but in the&nbsp;
case of this kettle apparently not even a third.

207
00:14:44,160 --> 00:14:50,746
This stove also sports a “quick boil” mega-burner&nbsp;
which outputs 17,000 BTUs/hour

208
00:14:50,746 --> 00:14:54,019
or 4,985 watts.

209
00:14:54,019 --> 00:14:58,720
This thing is so powerful&nbsp;
flames lick up the sides of the kettle.

210
00:14:59,440 --> 00:15:04,880
On this mega-burner, the time-to-boil&nbsp;
decreases to 4 minutes and 32 seconds&nbsp;&nbsp;

211
00:15:04,880 --> 00:15:10,560
which as it happens is exactly one second faster&nbsp;
than the time recorded by this electric kettle.&nbsp;&nbsp;

212
00:15:11,200 --> 00:15:15,398
But, that time savings comes with even less&nbsp;efficiency,

213
00:15:15,398 --> 00:15:24,480
as the total amount of energy needed to boil a liter of water on this burner climbs&nbsp;slightly from 356 to 376 watt-hours.&nbsp;&nbsp;

214
00:15:25,280 --> 00:15:31,760
Oh and by the way, 376 watt-hours isn’t just a&nbsp;
lot of energy to spend boiling a liter of water,&nbsp;&nbsp;

215
00:15:31,760 --> 00:15:36,713
it’ll also make your kitchen quite a bit warmer&nbsp;which is GREAT
on summer days.

216
00:15:36,713 --> 00:15:44,177
Oh, also the heat from the flames licking up the sides makes the handle too hot to&nbsp;touch with bare hands so that’s fun!

217
00:15:45,278 --> 00:15:51,196
There’s been a lot of talk lately about how gas stoves are&nbsp;
just… well kinda bad for lots of reasons

218
00:15:51,196 --> 00:15:54,367
and I gotta say this is revealing yet another reason.

219
00:15:54,367 --> 00:16:02,315
I mean, if it takes more than triple the energy output of a 1,500 watt electric kettle just to&nbsp;match its boiling time…

220
00:16:02,955 --> 00:16:04,573
all I can say is yikes.

221
00:16:04,960 --> 00:16:10,148
Let’s go back to the electric stove and see how&nbsp;
well it did from an efficiency standpoint.

222
00:16:10,148 --> 00:16:16,400
If we assume that this burner was outputting 2000 watts,&nbsp;
then the required time of exactly 6 minutes,&nbsp;&nbsp;

223
00:16:16,400 --> 00:16:22,224
which is exactly one tenth of an hour, meant 200&nbsp;
watt-hours were spent boiling the liter of water.&nbsp;&nbsp;

224
00:16:22,880 --> 00:16:26,960
That’s still much more than&nbsp;the electric kettle’s 108,&nbsp;&nbsp;

225
00:16:26,960 --> 00:16:32,750
but nowhere near as bad as the 356 required by the&nbsp;
slower gas burner.

226
00:16:32,750 --> 00:16:39,760
Putting the kettle in physical contact with the thing that gets hot seems to&nbsp;transfer heat energy much more effectively.&nbsp;&nbsp;

227
00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:43,995
For grins and giggles I timed this little hot&nbsp;plate.

228
00:16:43,995 --> 00:16:47,504
It only outputs 900 watts so it took…

229
00:16:48,240 --> 00:16:49,066
a while.

230
00:16:49,066 --> 00:16:50,880
13 minutes and 8 seconds, in fact.

231
00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:52,881
Let’s do the math, though.

232
00:16:52,881 --> 00:16:57,613
This thing really&nbsp;only outputs about 870 watts according to the kill-a-watt.

233
00:16:57,613 --> 00:17:02,800
13 minutes and 8 seconds at&nbsp;that power level works out to 190 watt-hours.

234
00:17:03,600 --> 00:17:07,261
This was definitely slower than the 2 kW burner,

235
00:17:07,261 --> 00:17:09,315
but it was a tad more efficient.

236
00:17:09,315 --> 00:17:10,926
At least, I assume so.

237
00:17:10,926 --> 00:17:16,953
Probably because the glass-ceramic cooktop works almost like a heat&nbsp;lamp pointing up at the kettle -

238
00:17:16,953 --> 00:17:23,296
it’s blasting infrared light at it, and since the kettle is&nbsp;
just a little bit smaller than the total area,

239
00:17:23,296 --> 00:17:26,740
some energy is making its way around the kettle’s&nbsp;sides.

240
00:17:26,740 --> 00:17:31,224
This burner, though, is simply gettin’ real hot thanks to a heating element inside of it,

241
00:17:31,224 --> 00:17:38,833
and with the kettle in physical contact a slight majority of that energy ends up getting absorbed&nbsp;by the kettle and into the water.

242
00:17:39,063 --> 00:17:39,948
Not bad.

243
00:17:40,240 --> 00:17:43,604
This probably means that the old fashioned&nbsp;curly-q burners

244
00:17:43,604 --> 00:17:49,253
might actually be the best conventional electric burner design,&nbsp;
at least when it comes to speed,

245
00:17:49,253 --> 00:17:54,998
since they have relatively little thermal mass and the&nbsp;
element itself stays in contact with the cookware.

246
00:17:55,434 --> 00:17:56,964
With everything we’ve seen,

247
00:17:56,964 --> 00:18:01,431
I think it’s clear&nbsp;that if you want to boil water conveniently and quickly,

248
00:18:01,431 --> 00:18:06,000
the electric kettle remains your&nbsp;
best option despite our weedy little plugs.

249
00:18:06,720 --> 00:18:09,794
But this may be about to change.

250
00:18:09,794 --> 00:18:15,847
Thanks to&nbsp;induction technology, the stovetop kettle can be even faster than an electric kettle -

251
00:18:15,847 --> 00:18:19,530
in&nbsp;fact, potentially faster than a European one.

252
00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:22,715
Induction stoves are the new hotness,

253
00:18:22,715 --> 00:18:28,582
and they work by sending high-frequency alternating current through a coil&nbsp;of wire beneath the cooking surface.&nbsp;&nbsp;

254
00:18:28,880 --> 00:18:36,118
When a suitable cooking vessel is placed above it,&nbsp;
electric currents are induced within the vessel’s&nbsp;metal base.

255
00:18:36,118 --> 00:18:40,299
Those currents will actually heat the&nbsp;
bottom of the pot or what have you

256
00:18:40,299 --> 00:18:43,186
just like the current flowing through a heating element.

257
00:18:43,186 --> 00:18:48,387
In&nbsp;effect, it turns the pot itself into the heating element!

258
00:18:48,387 --> 00:18:51,395
Now, I don’t have an induction stove,

259
00:18:51,395 --> 00:18:55,279
but I do have this plug-in induction cooktop!

260
00:18:56,175 --> 00:19:01,706
This thing is not shy of pulling the full 15A&nbsp;from an electrical circuit, and on full-power

261
00:19:01,706 --> 00:19:06,072
it consumes just about the 1,800W that it claims to.

262
00:19:06,072 --> 00:19:10,589
Now, there’s some waste in this process - that’s why this thing has a cooling fan in it -

263
00:19:10,589 --> 00:19:15,315
so&nbsp;I don’t know exactly how much is actually getting transmitted into the kettle.

264
00:19:15,315 --> 00:19:21,797
But at full&nbsp;power, this brought a liter of water to boil in 4 minutes and 29 seconds.

265
00:19:21,797 --> 00:19:28,420
That’s the fastest&nbsp;result we’ve seen,
suggesting at least 1,500 watts is making it into the water.

266
00:19:28,420 --> 00:19:33,794
And keep in mind,&nbsp;this is limited to what comes from an ordinary electrical outlet.

267
00:19:33,794 --> 00:19:40,867
The hardwired induction cooktops you’ll&nbsp;
find either on their own or attached to an oven often feature a burner...

268
00:19:40,867 --> 00:19:47,665
or I guess a better&nbsp;word is emitter - that can pump out close to four kilowatts, sometimes more!

269
00:19:47,665 --> 00:19:51,840
With one of those, you&nbsp;could boil a liter of water in 90 seconds flat.

270
00:19:52,400 --> 00:19:54,908
Still, speed isn’t everything.

271
00:19:54,908 --> 00:20:00,360
One very handy&nbsp;feature of nearly all electric kettles is that automatic shut-off.

272
00:20:00,360 --> 00:20:04,000
That does give them an element&nbsp;
of safety which is missing from a stovetop kettle.

273
00:20:05,216 --> 00:20:10,298
I think there’s a certain charm in household&nbsp;
objects that scream at you when they’re ready,&nbsp;&nbsp;

274
00:20:10,720 --> 00:20:14,732
but I’ll admit a more silent option is nice.

275
00:20:14,732 --> 00:20:18,463
Plus, unless and until I get a proper induction stove,

276
00:20:18,463 --> 00:20:20,678
this remains the fastest...

277
00:20:21,778 --> 00:20:23,435
OK, this was a little bit faster

278
00:20:23,435 --> 00:20:27,883
but the most convenient and efficient option&nbsp;
for boiling water.

279
00:20:27,883 --> 00:20:33,349
Though I don’t often drink tea, I’ve kept a kettle around because it’s&nbsp;just too handy.

280
00:20:33,349 --> 00:20:41,673
Even if I’m making pasta it’s faster to fill this up, bring it to a boil,
and then pour the water from it into a pot on the stove

281
00:20:41,673 --> 00:20:44,512
than it is to use the stove to boil the water.

282
00:20:44,512 --> 00:20:46,943
Which&nbsp;is nuts but it’s the truth!

283
00:20:46,943 --> 00:20:50,220
Plus the kitchen doesn’t get nearly as hot when you do that,

284
00:20:50,220 --> 00:20:55,232
and I don’t have to run the stove as long which is great for indoor air quality.

285
00:20:55,232 --> 00:20:58,999
I should&nbsp;make a video about that, too, it’s astounding how bad these are.

286
00:20:58,999 --> 00:21:03,450
It’s almost like combusting&nbsp;fossil fuels inside of a living space is a bad idea!

287
00:21:03,760 --> 00:21:05,687
Aside from that great benefit,

288
00:21:05,687 --> 00:21:10,237
there are also fancier&nbsp;kettles available
which let you set them to a specific temperature.

289
00:21:10,237 --> 00:21:13,699
Great for certain types&nbsp;of tea or really pedantic coffee sno -

290
00:21:13,699 --> 00:21:14,975
I mean enthusiasts.

291
00:21:14,975 --> 00:21:19,278
And if you’re really bothered&nbsp;
by waiting four minutes for boiled water,

292
00:21:19,278 --> 00:21:23,187
there are a few solutions that are much&nbsp;
less involved than rewiring your kitchen.

293
00:21:23,600 --> 00:21:26,157
First, and here’s a wild idea,

294
00:21:26,157 --> 00:21:28,699
just don’t&nbsp;fill the kettle up all the way!

295
00:21:28,699 --> 00:21:33,360
It takes more time to boil more water, and&nbsp;
if you’re just making a cup for yourself,

296
00:21:34,080 --> 00:21:36,176
only fill the kettle to the minimum mark.

297
00:21:36,176 --> 00:21:44,080
On many&nbsp;kettles that can be as little as half a liter, which only takes a hair over 2 minutes to&nbsp;boil even with our pathetic little plugs.&nbsp;&nbsp;

298
00:21:44,362 --> 00:21:49,646
But watch out, as there are kettles out there&nbsp;
which don’t operate at 1500 watts.

299
00:21:49,928 --> 00:21:50,682
Like this one!

300
00:21:51,040 --> 00:21:57,036
It may look nicer than the cheap Walmart&nbsp;
kettle but it’s definitely worse at being&nbsp;a kettle.

301
00:21:57,036 --> 00:22:00,339
Oohh but it did come with this&nbsp;
free loose leaf tea infuser so that’s nice!

302
00:22:00,960 --> 00:22:04,400
Another option you might want to look&nbsp;
into if you’re particularly impatient&nbsp;&nbsp;

303
00:22:04,400 --> 00:22:06,434
is something like this.

304
00:22:06,434 --> 00:22:10,992
You’re right, this isn’t&nbsp;a kettle, but you could call it better than a kettle!

305
00:22:10,992 --> 00:22:12,439
These…

306
00:22:12,439 --> 00:22:18,022
well I don’t know what the proper name is&nbsp;
but boiler, warmer, and dispenser all seem like common words so let’s go with…

307
00:22:18,022 --> 00:22:19,324
hot water&nbsp;dispenser.

308
00:22:19,324 --> 00:22:25,935
These hot water dispensers feature an insulated tank which they will diligently keep at&nbsp;your desired temperature.

309
00:22:25,935 --> 00:22:32,834
Many also feature timer functions to allow you to set when you want&nbsp;them ready so they don’t waste much energy when you don't need them.

310
00:22:33,360 --> 00:22:37,104
Use one of these and you don’t ever have to wait&nbsp;for a kettle!

311
00:22:37,104 --> 00:22:37,906
And!

312
00:22:37,906 --> 00:22:40,240
They actually only need 700 watts.

313
00:22:41,040 --> 00:22:45,040
There might be some merit to keeping&nbsp;an insulated tank of water around&nbsp;&nbsp;

314
00:22:45,040 --> 00:22:49,040
rather than pumping 3 whole kilowatts of heat&nbsp;
into cold water whenever you feel like it.

315
00:22:49,760 --> 00:22:52,557
Anyway, that’s all I’ve got for you with&nbsp;this video.

316
00:22:52,557 --> 00:23:01,682
This whole kettle discourse is so wild to me - I get it, you’ve got three kilowatts&nbsp;of water boiling power at any outlet!

317
00:23:01,682 --> 00:23:05,810
It’s gotta be kind of annoying when you make a visit to&nbsp;
this continent - or worse move here -

318
00:23:05,810 --> 00:23:10,530
and suddenly it takes a whole two more minutes to&nbsp;
boil a liter of water.

319
00:23:10,530 --> 00:23:11,760
I mean, you poor things.

320
00:23:12,320 --> 00:23:16,561
But like, I do want to point out that I think&nbsp;
it’s kinda hilarious how,

321
00:23:16,561 --> 00:23:18,900
aside from electric vehicle charging,

322
00:23:18,900 --> 00:23:25,753
boiling water quickly is&nbsp;about the only practical benefit 
to having that much power at any receptacle.

323
00:23:25,753 --> 00:23:33,448
This is the&nbsp;one thing that seems to get stuck in the craw of lots of folks regarding our electrical system&nbsp;which is just…

324
00:23:33,448 --> 00:23:35,588
well it’s kinda funny to me, that’s all.

325
00:23:35,588 --> 00:23:42,254
Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of objectively terrible&nbsp;
things about our electrical system!

326
00:23:42,254 --> 00:23:45,731
But even here, unless you’ve got an induction stove,

327
00:23:45,731 --> 00:23:48,485
this&nbsp;is still the fastest way to get a cuppa.

328
00:23:49,355 --> 00:23:52,008
♫ scaldingly smooth jazz ♫

329
00:23:53,493 --> 00:23:55,340
Which actually… huh!

330
00:23:57,004 --> 00:24:00,115
I brought the kettle and&nbsp;my measury bottle with me for a…

331
00:24:00,755 --> 00:24:02,429
no, that was correct! You…

332
00:24:02,429 --> 00:24:05,563
I brought the kettle and my
[weird&nbsp;foghorn noise]

333
00:24:05,563 --> 00:24:08,362
I brought the kettle and my measury bottle along with a…

334
00:24:08,362 --> 00:24:09,638
*sigh*

335
00:24:10,841 --> 00:24:14,440
…same thing. And we can convert between units easily.

336
00:24:14,440 --> 00:24:18,521
One… yeah I'm gonna throw... I don’t like how that went.

337
00:24:18,521 --> 00:24:21,280
How many watt-hours did it&nbsp;
take this kettle to boil?

338
00:24:23,920 --> 00:24:27,840
But, since we tend to measure power&nbsp;
output in watts it’s usually easue…&nbsp;&nbsp;

339
00:24:30,000 --> 00:24:32,033
usually eazuier.

340
00:24:32,033 --> 00:24:33,629
It’s just&nbsp;not the average…

341
00:24:34,115 --> 00:24:35,417
*sigh*

342
00:24:36,902 --> 00:24:37,641
poop.

343
00:24:39,049 --> 00:24:43,108
There's a good deal of stuff that got cut from this script because this felt like a very pointless video.

344
00:24:43,108 --> 00:24:44,213
But!

345
00:24:44,213 --> 00:24:47,714
I've actually recorded a follow-up video which I will be editing shortly!

346
00:24:47,714 --> 00:24:50,445
And it contains those deleted sections!

347
00:24:50,445 --> 00:24:53,134
And it will go up here on the main channel!

348
00:24:53,134 --> 00:24:54,659
Exclamation points!

